OK, so ⌠there was some confusion over the date of this meeting which turns out to have been a printer problem. It was meant to be delayed to next week, but because the original flier said 18th, the owner turned up in any case, so I got to meet him and hear some more details of the backstory. I will attempt to summarise it below for information. Please note, I am summarising his information, and not in a position to confirm it, so this is just so that we all have a better understanding of what, and why, he is proposing the above.
Please also note that this summary, and any ideas or commentary, are my personal reflections and are not necessarily endorsements from the @foresthillsociety
The owner is Johnny Srikrishna. He owns and runs the SJS business which is an independent operator of forecourt businesses.
His family have owned the 1 Waldram Park Road site for 40 years or so. His father set up a convenience store there when it stopped being a BP garage, and then eventually leased it to the Co-op for 20 years.
Once that lease expired (around 2018), they wanted to build a residential building on the site and spent a great deal of time (and money) developing drawings for this that went to Lewisham Planning committee who refused it and required changes multiple times. The effective message that the owners got was that Lewisham was not interested in residential construction here. However, that was their original intention.
Once they realised this, they converted the proposal to make it a hotel, and Lewisham Planning was apparently very receptive to this (even though the actual plans were not greatly different), and even provided help and guidance. This was the proposal that was therefore consulted on locally, and was eventually accepted.
The owners had a franchise agreement with Holiday Inn to operate the hotel at this point.
That is why the site was demolished and prepared for development ⌠just before Covid happened.
The delays, and cost increases, this caused meant that Holiday Inn pulled out. Instead, Travelodge agreed to step in (and even to help funding, apparently), and so planning continued. Unfortunately, while this was going on, UK construction costs, and UK interest rates, increased dramatically, doubling the cost of construction and reducing or removing the profit of the operation for both owners and potential operators. Eventually Travelodge also pulled out.
On top of all of this, BT (and the company theyâve sold their real-estate to), threatened to litigate for their âright to lightâ for the Telephone Exchange next door. This is a ridiculous request, but represented another HUGE cost, and was simply profiteering from these companies (that have absolutely no need for light for an unoccupied and under-utilised building).
All together, this stopped all existing plans for the site, leaving the owners with a demolished site, and a huge investment to date in planning, clearing and legal fees.
That is why they have reverted the plan to something simple (for them) which is to operate a single storey (i.e. not affecting the right-to-light of the exchange) retail operation and EV charging hub. This is potentially a short to medium term solution that could easily be replaced and redeveloped if the situation were to change in the next 5-10 years, or could keep operating. However, it brings the site into use, and helps them recover some of the costs to date.
The retail space available will be a bit larger than the previous size of the Co-op (will be about 200sqm), but not large enough for M&S and others, so those are not potential clients for this site. This is a local convenience store, not a âsupermarketâ location. (I am not certain whether even building on the whole plot would be big enough, and even if you did, there would be no solution to the parking and delivery issues this would cause). Morrisons have indicated an interest in the site, and apparently there will be opportunities for it to stock âlocalâ products (eg. bread, coffee, honey,âŚ)
So, the issues that come to mind to be addressed will be:
- what does Lewisham Council want more? Employment (for around 12 people) on this site, or the potential for a mixed use, or even fully residential construction, and what can they do to make the economics of this stack up?
- how can we persuade BT to drop requests for huge sums for right to light, and possibly even close and redevelop the Telephone Exchange as well (that would be another huge development opportunity locally), so that a larger, multi-storey building could be built?
- If we are to accept the small retail and EV charging option for the short term, will the mitigations for noise, access, etc. be sufficient to make it a good new neighbour?
Hopefully this gives everyone a slightly fuller picture of the background to this proposal. As I say, this is a report of the information I was given, but I have not investigated it or confirmed it, so others may have comments on the accuracy (of the story or my memory).
I have pointed Johnny to this topic and to the strength of feeling in the community, so hopefully our ideas and comments can be taken into account, and he may even chip in at some point.
I also hope that this is useful for the @PVCllrs who will consider the value of different solutions to the ward and the area.